by Amy
From our tree house here, high above the publishing jungle,
we hear things. (I hear things in coffee shops, too, and sometimes they end up in
my books.) Lately, the term “hybrid publishing” has been tickling our ears.
Monkeys love tickles and I was intrigued, so I snuffled around to see what all
the hub-bub was about.
Hybrid publishing was originally minted to refer to those
lucky self-published books that were later picked up by a traditional publisher. There are many examples of these 'cross-over' books, but I’ll
point out PJ Hoover and her book Solstice,
because she’s my Facebook friend and I like her.
Ironically, the term also applies to the opposite situation.
Books that were originally published by
a traditional publisher and have gone out of print or are stuck on a backlist are being reclaimed by the authors, repackaged and re-released, either as
ebooks or POD. I personally know of three well-published authors in the midst
of this now. The process isn’t always easy – publishers are sometimes reluctant
to let go of the rights. But those authors who can swing it get 100% royalties, lots of freedom and massive power.
And a tiara. And a cape. (Part of that might be a lie.) Hybrid
publishing is also used to describe traditionally published authors who decide
to go the self-published route with their later books. But to me, that’s just
self-publishing by a famous person.
(My tiara. I wear it on Wednesdays.) |
Teams are fun! |
A company called NetMinds is focusing on this ‘team approach’ with their Disruptive Team Publishing Platform, touted as “an alternative to traditional and self-publishing.” From
their press release:
Net Minds has built a software
platform that allows authors to find any member of the publishing value chain,
such as editors, designers, publicists, etc., selecting potential collaborators
through a discovery system that includes ratings and commentary on a
professional’s work. These teammates are invited into, or can request to join a
project, offered traditional transactional and non-traditional compensation
options, like percentages of the book’s financial performance, and the
community then produces the book.”
In a similar-but-slightly-different vein, there is Diversion Books,
headed by Scott Waxman, of Waxman Leavall Literary Agency (no stranger to traditional
publishing.) Diversion offers “…a full service approach to production,
marketing, and publicity, and engages the latest tools and technologies in
order to produce and promote its titles in the best possible way.” To over-simplify their services...they help you self-publish your
book, BUT there is a submission process and they don’t accept every project.
They also take more in royalties than self-publishers but the author’s cut is
still significantly higher than with traditional publishing—50% or more.
Sadly, Diversion does not accept children’s, MG or YA titles at this time.
So, all of this is VERY cool stuff, but what do you guys think? Is this the way of the future? What are the drawbacks? Would you hybrid publish?
I liken the last example similar to film production (I liken a lot of things to film). As you know most Film Production Companies have a core of just 5 people, then through each process of production they hire in "contractors" such as a writer, director, cinematographer, editor, special effects artist...oh and of course actors, terminating their contracts as soon as their jobs are done. The end product is hopefully larger than the sum of their contributions. I think i shall do this with my film company, create some sort of hybrid publishing team. Great eye opening blog here Amy.
ReplyDeleteIt sounds very similar to film production, then. I am looking foward to going through the process as a hybrid publisher and comparing it to my previous self-publishing experience.
ReplyDeleteThis ties in well with the recent FB discussion on our need to be entrepreneurs, which doesn't mean we have to do everything ourselves! Indeed, for many the team approach will be the most successful. So, yes, I would hybrid publish if I self publish because I would need and want the expertise of others in order to give my book the best possible chance.
ReplyDeleteThose are exactly my thoughts, too, Joanna! And having self-published before, I know what a lonely road it can be. I look forward to having a team, this time around. :)
Delete